Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Nohr v. Jang et al
as 1:2014cv02761
Plaintiff:
Jason L. Nohr
Defendant:
Corinna Jang, Chris Litsey, Mary Jane Bender and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
ROYSTER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC et al. v. BP EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION INC et al.
as 3:2013cv00245
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY L MIMS, AARON YOUNG, EMORY CAREY and others
Defendant:
BP CORPORATION NORTH AMERICA INC, HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, BP PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Hardy v. Baker et al
as 1:2012cv01290
Plaintiff:
Chandra Y. Hardy
Defendant:
Michelle Murrell Baker, Adedamola A. Laniyan, Gigi Smeido and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, et al v. Waterman Broadcasting Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv22007
Defendant:
Tod Beneficiaries on File, Waterman Broadcasting Corporation, Sharon Rosenhause and others
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, Law Debenture Trust Company of New York and Wilmington Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Capital Investment Advisors LLC et al v. Greenhunter Energy Inc et al
as 2:2010cv02505
Plaintiff:
Capital Investment Advisors LLC , Charles Evans , Alys Wilson and others
Defendant:
Greenhunter Energy Inc , Direct Capital Securities Inc, Adageo Energy Group LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Baker v. River City Bank
as 0:2008cv60158
Plaintiff:
Kalilah Y Baker
Defendant:
River City Bank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Baker v. Chase Home Mortgage
as 1:2008cv00039
Plaintiff:
Barbara Baker
Defendant:
Chase Home Mortgage
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Floyd S. Salser, Jr. & Associates, Inc. v. Champagne et al
as 5:2007cv00402
Plaintiff:
Floyd S. Salser, Jr. & Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
Mark A. Champagne, James R. Smith, III, Jason E. Pintok and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
