Social Security Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
BAKER v. KIJAKAZI We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00590
Plaintiff: SCOTT T. BAKER
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
BAKER v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv01760
Plaintiff: JARED M. BAKER
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
BAKER v. SAUL
as 4:2021cv00017
Plaintiff: JEREMY DANIEL BAKER
Defendant: ANDREW SAUL and ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BAKER v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv02049
Plaintiff: TAMMY L. BAKER
Defendant: ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BAKER v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2019cv00002
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff: LONNIE D. BAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BAKER v. BERRYHILL
as 3:2017cv00107
Plaintiff: KELLY A. BAKER
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Miscellaneou: SSA (Court Use Only) and USM (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
BAKER v. COLVIN
as 1:2016cv03367
Plaintiff: SONYA D. BAKER
Defendant: CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Miscellaneou: SSA (Court Use Only) and USM (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
BAKER v. COLVIN
as 1:2016cv00295
Plaintiff: JAMES D. BAKER
Defendant: CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Miscellaneou: SSA (Court Use Only) and USM (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
BAKER v. COLVIN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv01928
Plaintiff: DANIEL D. BAKER
Defendant: CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Miscellaneou: SSA (Court Use Only) and USM (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
BAKER v. COLVIN
as 1:2015cv01084
Plaintiff: MATTHEW K. BAKER
Defendant: CAROLYN COLVIN
Miscellaneou: SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?