Cases 11 - 20 of 190
CLEVELAND BAKERS AND TEAMSTERS PENSION FUND v. KORNIT DIGITAL LTD. et al
as 2:2023cv00971
Plaintiff:
CLEVELAND BAKERS AND TEAMSTERS PENSION FUND
Defendant:
KORNIT DIGITAL LTD., RONEN SAMUEL, ALON ROZNER and others
Petitioner:
PHV DANA M. SESHENS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv05120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. 3 B'S LOUNGE, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv01478
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
3 B'S LOUNGE, INC., ERIC K. BAKER, RALPH K. BAKER and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 U.S.C.A. Cable Communications Policy Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv06082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv05959
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05959
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Lawrence v. Tyme Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01133
Plaintiff:
Richard Lawrence
Defendant:
Tyme Technologies, Inc., Douglas A. Michels, Christine D. Baker and others
IRWIN v. TYME TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 3:2022cv04727
Plaintiff:
JAMES IRWIN
Defendant:
TYME TECHNOLOGIES, INC., DOUGLAS A. MICHELS, CHRISTINE D. BAKER and others
BAKER v. ZURN WATER SOLUTIONS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2022cv01629
Plaintiff:
LEWIS D BAKER
Defendant:
ZURN WATER SOLUTIONS CORPORATION, TODD A ADAMS, MARK S BARTLETT and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
BAKER v. US ECOLOGY, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv01053
Plaintiff:
LEWIS D BAKER
Defendant:
US ECOLOGY, INC., RICHARD BURKE, E. RENAE CONLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
