Cases 31 - 40 of 190
BAKER v. WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv01034
Plaintiff:
LEWIS D BAKER
Defendant:
SHARILYN S GASAWAY, PHILIP J SANDERS, JAMES A JESSEE and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
BAKER v. NAVISTAR INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv00762
Defendant:
JOSE MARIA ALAPONT, CHRISTIAN SCHULZ, VINCENT J INTRIERI and others
Plaintiff:
LEWIS D BAKER
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
BAKER v. CHW GROUP, INC.
as 2:2021cv01308
Plaintiff:
TYLER BAKER
Defendant:
CHW GROUP, INC. D/B/A CHOICE HOME WARRANTY and CHW GROUP, INC. doing business as CHOICE HOME WARRANTY
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Andescavage v. QEP Resources, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00096
Defendant:
QEP Resources, Inc., Michael J. Minarovic, Barth E. Whitham and others
Plaintiff:
John Andescavage
Yaw et al v. THE DELAWARE RIVER BASIN COMMISSION
as 2:2021cv00119
Plaintiff:
Damascus Township, LISA BAKER, Gene Yaw and others
Defendant:
THE DELAWARE RIVER BASIN COMMISSION
Intervenor Defendant:
DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER NETWORK and MAYA K. VAN ROSSUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Baker v. Endurance International Group Holdings Inc., et al.
as 1:2020cv01691
Defendant:
Jeff Fox, James C. Neary, Tomas Gorny and others
Plaintiff:
Lewis D. Baker
Baker v. Tengasco, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01681
Defendant:
Antman Sub, LLC, Tengasco, Inc., Richard Thon and others
Plaintiff:
Lewis D. Baker
Baker v. The Goldfield Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv01672
Defendant:
John P. Fazzini, The Goldfield Corporation, David P. Bicks and others
Plaintiff:
Lewis D. Baker
Kenneth LewisIn re: Kenneth Lewis
as 20-3450
Respondent:
ANN WILLIAMS, ELLEN E. BOSHKOFF, BRADLEY MURPHY and others
Petitioner:
In re: KENNETH WAYNE LEWIS
Baker v. RMG Acquisition Corp. et al
as 1:2020cv01619
Defendant:
Robert S. Mancini, RMG Merger Sub, Inc., Philip Kassin and others
Plaintiff:
Lewis D. Baker
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
