Cases 21 - 30 of 193
GRANT II v. BAKER III
as 1:2021cv01173
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LEE GRANT II and WILLIAM LEE GRANT, II
Defendant:
JAMES A BAKER III and JAMES A. BAKER, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02668
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
GRANT v. BAKER et al
as 1:2020cv02112
Defendant:
JAMES A. BAKER and UNITED STATES NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LEE GRANT, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRANT v. BAKER et al
as 1:2020cv02095
Defendant:
U.S. NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL, JAMES A. BAKER and STATE OF ILLINOIS
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LEE GRANT, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRANT v. BAKER et al
as 1:2020cv02030
Defendant:
JAMES A. BAKER, STATE OF ILLINOIS and WHITE HOUSE CHIEF OF STAFF
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LEE GRANT, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRANT v. BAKER et al
as 1:2020cv01724
Defendant:
JAMES A. BAKER and STATE OF ILLINOIS
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LEE GRANT, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRANT v. BAKER et al
as 1:2020cv01725
Defendant:
JAMES A. BAKER, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and STATE OF ILLINOIS
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LEE GRANT, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Brud Rossman v. Elizabeth Wingo, et al
as 20-7053
Defendant / Appellee:
Elizabeth Wingo, Judge, D.C. Superior Court D.C. Courthouse, Zachrous Hunter, Deputy Executive Director CCNV, Rico Harris, Executive Director CCNV and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Brad Rudolph Rossman, Esquire
TAITT et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2020cv01557
Plaintiff:
MARLON CARTER, LYNELL COOPER, PAUL GRAHAM and others
Defendant:
THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, THE REPUBLIC OF SUDAN, REPUBLIC OF SUDAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
