Cases 1 - 7 of 7
McCord v. Yancy et al
as 1:2009cv01237
Plaintiff:
Rogerick V. McCord
Defendant:
George Yancy, Baker Energy, Inc. and Sayle Oil Company, Inc.
Miscellaneou:
Ronnie Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
G.D. Deal Holdings, Inc, et al v. Baker Energy, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv04965
Plaintiff:
G.D. Deal Holdings, Inc, et al
Defendant:
Baker Energy, Inc., Rohit Sharma and Surinder Multani
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
GD Deal Holdings LLC et al v. Baker Energy Inc et al
as 2:2007mc00085
Plaintiff:
GD Deal Holdings LLC and Girkin Development LLC
Defendant:
Baker Energy Inc, Rohit Sharma and Surinder Multani
G.D. Deal Holdings, et al v. Baker Energy, et al
as 07-5836
Plaintiff - Appellee:
G.D. DEAL HOLDINGS, LLC, GIRKIN DEVELOPMENT, LLC and CROWN OIL AND PETROLEUM SUPPLIES, LLC, a Wisconsin limited liability company
Intervenor - Appellee:
THE CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY, INC.
Defendant:
BAKER ENERGY, INC, RAMESH KAPUR and BHUPINDER SAINI
Defendant - Appellant:
SURINDER MULTANI and ROHIT SHARMA
GD Deal Holdings, Inc. v. Baker Energy, Inc.
as 2:2007mc00013
Plaintiff:
GD Deal Holdings, Inc.
Defendant:
Baker Energy, Inc.
Godfather's Pizza, Inc. v. Canda Mart, LLC et al
as 1:2007cv00052
Plaintiff:
Godfather's Pizza, Inc. and Godfather's Pizza, Inc.
Defendant:
Canda Mart, LLC, Team Work Enterprises, Inc. and Team Work Enterprises, Inc.
Cross Claimant:
Team Work Enterprises, Inc. and Team Work Enterprises, Inc.
Cross Defendant:
Baker Energy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Godfather's Pizza, Inc. v. Om Deep, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00048
Plaintiff:
Godfather's Pizza, Inc. and Godfather's Pizza, Inc.
Defendant:
Om Deep, Inc. and Om Deep, Inc.
Cross Claimant:
Om Deep, Inc. and Om Deep, Inc.
Cross Defendant:
Baker Energy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
