Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Ballard (PS) v. Taylor
as 1:2024cv00251
Petitioner:
Danielle Elizabeth Ballard
Respondent:
Mark Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ballard (PS) v. Taylor
as 1:2024cv00252
Petitioner:
Jacqueline Ballard
Respondent:
Mark Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Loggins v. Dept of Health and Human Services et al
as 1:2023cv00257
Plaintiff:
Vincent Eugene Loggins
Defendant:
Dept. of Health, Human Services, Jill Marshell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Loggins v. Mangosa et al
as 1:2022cv00029
Plaintiff:
Vincent E. Loggins and Loggings
Defendant:
Micheele, Elija Ballard Craft, Ben Mangosa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tucker v. Ballard
as 1:2020cv00588
Plaintiff:
Amanda D Tucker
Defendant:
Amanda Mixon and Donna Ballard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Loxo Oncology, Inc. et al v. Array Biopharma, Inc.
as 1:2018cv03062
Plaintiff:
Tony Morales, Andrew Metcalf, Loxo Oncology, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Array Biopharma, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Schwab et al v. Kobach et al
as 1:2018cv02190
Defendant:
KVCA, Phyllis Gilmore, Riley County Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond R. Schwab and Amelia D. Schwab
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2018cv01302
Plaintiff:
Dennis Flanagan, Mary Martinez, Kelii Apo and others
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Kidde PLC, Inc, Kidde-Fenwal, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 t
Ballard v. Praetorian Insurance Company
as 1:2018cv00036
Plaintiff:
Robert Ballard
Defendant:
Praetorian Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02710
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
