Cases 41 - 50 of 493
Nowlin v. Upton et al
as 4:2016cv01046
Petitioner:
Yolanda Nowlin
Respondent:
Jody Upton, Barack Obama and Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Young Jo v. Six Unknown Names Agents, et al
as 16-51332
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YOUNG YIL JO
Defendant - Appellee:
SIX UNKNOWN NAMES AGENTS and MR. PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA
Brown v. Upton et al
as 4:2016cv00988
Petitioner:
Jennifer Lynn Brown
Respondent:
Jody Upton , Department of Justice and Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Fleming v. Upton et al
as 4:2016cv00989
Petitioner:
Rhonda Fleming
Respondent:
Jody Upton , Department of Justice and Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Young Jo v. Six Unknown Names Agents, et al
as 16-51012
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YOUNG YIL JO
Defendant - Appellee:
SIX UNKNOWN NAMES AGENTS and MR. PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA
Lillie v. The First Black President Mr. Barack Obama
as 2:2016cv00172
Plaintiff:
Wilbert Lee Trayvon Lillie
Defendant:
The First Black President Mr. Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jo v. Six Unknown Names Agents or Mr. President Barack Obama
as 4:2016cv00371
Plaintiff:
Young Yil Jo
Defendant:
Six Unknown Names Agents or Mr. President Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jo v. Six Unknown Names Agents or Mr. President Barack Obama
as 4:2016cv00373
Plaintiff:
Young Yil Jo
Defendant:
Six Unknown Names Agents or Mr. President Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jo v. Six Unknown Names Agents or Mr. President Barack Obama
as 4:2016cv00368
Plaintiff:
Young Yil Jo
Defendant:
Six Unknown Names Agents or Mr. President Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jo v. Six Unknown Names Agents or Mr. President Barack Obama
as 4:2016cv00374
Plaintiff:
Young Yil Jo
Defendant:
Six Unknown Names Agents or Mr. President Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
