Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Barker v. SunPower Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
Laurence Barker
Defendant:
SunPower Corporation, Photon Rainbow LLC and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Barker v. GR Investment Group LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00332
Defendant:
Gustav Renny, GR Investment Group LLC, Gustav Zurak and others
Plaintiff:
Laurence Barker
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
United States v. Barker
as 22-3283
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
VALERIE ANN BARKER
1% Fitness v. Boyd et al
as 2:2022cv00415
Plaintiff:
1% Fitness
Defendant:
Daniel Boyd, Jody Rookstool, Zach Barker and others
Waldron v. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00682
Defendant:
Jon Barker, Gregory P. Hickey, Christopher Eastland and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Waldron
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 10
Barker v. Utah Dept of Enviro Quality, et al
as 21-4024
Defendant / Appellee:
RUSTY LUNDBERG, AMANDA SMITH, UTAH DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDITH BARKER
Swomley, et al v. Schroyer, et al
as 20-1335
Petitioner / Appellant:
TOM STEWART, ERIC VOTH, SARAH SWOMLEY and others
Respondent / Appellee:
KAREN SCHROYER, in her official capacity as District Ranger, Aspen-Sopris Ranger District, White River National Forest, United States Forest Service and UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, a federal agency of the United States Department of Agriculture
Smith v. Barker, et al
as 19-1469
Defendant / Appellee:
JERRY ROARK, STEVEN SALAZAR, PPMU MR. COOK and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RODNEY A. SMITH
Barker v. Schnurr
as 19-3266
Petitioner / Appellant:
BILLY JOE BARKER, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
DAN SCHNURR
Quest Solution et al v. Redlpr LLC et al
as 2:2019cv00437
Plaintiff:
HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution and others
Defendant:
Redlpr LLC, Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Sagy Amit and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
