Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Castaneda v. Barker
as 2:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
Antonio Castaneda
Defendant:
David Barker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Warenback v. 8th Judicial District Court, Clark County, Nevada et al
as 2:2022cv01342
Plaintiff:
Douglas Harry Warenback
Defendant:
8th Judicial District Court, Clark County, Nevada, David B. Barker and Aaron Ford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bristow et al v. Sanchez et al
as 2:2022cv01092
Plaintiff:
James Bristow and Lateefa Starks
Defendant:
Yudel Omar Sanchez, LVMPD Officer D. Sutton, Detective C. Reich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barker v. 99 Cents Only Stores LLC
as 2:2022cv00428
Plaintiff:
Traci Barker
Defendant:
99 Cents Only Stores LLC doing business as 99 Cents Only Store #333
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Barker v. Baker et al
as 3:2019cv00159
Defendant:
Carpenter, Hanf and Baker
Plaintiff:
James Barker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barker v. Baker et al
as 3:2019cv00161
Defendant:
Lyndberg, Baker and Snyder
Plaintiff:
James Barker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barker v. Baker et al
as 3:2019cv00158
Defendant:
Baker, Perez, Link and others
Plaintiff:
James Barker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abadjian et al v. Teva Parenteral Medicines, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv02321
Plaintiff:
Brenda Bradford, Narcisco Rene Aguilar, Dorothy Barbee and others
Defendant:
Teva Parenteral Medicines, Inc., McKesson Medical-Surgical Inc., Baxter Healthcare Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bank v. Nevada DPS et al
as 2:2016cv01255
Plaintiff:
Steven J. Bank
Defendant:
David Barker, Michelle Leavitt, Nevada DPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Magnetic v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2016cv00138
Defendant:
Aramark, David Barker, Linda Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Infinite Master Magnetic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
