Cases 1 - 10 of 88
Williams v. Perryman et al
as 6:2023cv00354
Plaintiff:
Jay Williams
Defendant:
Judge Nancy Perryman, Judge Tony Duncan, Judge Scott McKee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barker v. O Ajaru et al
as 3:2023cv00163
Plaintiff:
Don Barker
Defendant:
Peter Claver O Ajaru and Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barker v. O Ajaru et al
as 4:2023cv01872
Plaintiff:
Don Barker
Defendant:
Peter Claver O Ajaru and Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barker v. Henderson County Jail et al
as 6:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
Scotty Lemond Barker
Defendant:
Henderson County Jail and Colton Alsobrook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barker v. Hillhouse
as 6:2023cv00190
Petitioner:
Scotty Lemond Barker
Respondent:
Botie Hillhouse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barker v. Smith
as 4:2023cv00012
Petitioner:
Christeena Janell Barker
Respondent:
Warden Michael Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Kitchen v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice et al
as 4:2022cv03370
Plaintiff:
Thomas C Kitchen
Defendant:
Texas Department Of Criminal Justice, Bryan Collier, Dana Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barker v. Collier et al
as 4:2022cv02816
Plaintiff:
Arthur Joyal Barker
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin, Kenneth Putnam and others
Amicus Curiae:
The Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barker v. Ochoc et al
as 4:2022cv02817
Plaintiff:
Arthur Joyal Barker
Defendant:
Amber Ochoc, Marcus Spivey, Melissa Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barker v. TDCJ - State Jail Division
as 4:2022cv00179
Plaintiff:
Darquese Barker
Defendant:
TDCJ - State Jail Division
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
