Cases 1 - 10 of 62
United States of America et al v. Joint Technology, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00430
Plaintiff:
United States of America, Reynaldo Solano, California State Of and others
Defendant:
Joint Technology Inc doing business as Revert Systems, Jim Patton, Dr. John Barr and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Sweet et al v. Midfirst Bank et al
as 4:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Carrie Sweet and Allen W Sweet
Defendant:
Midfirst Bank, David L Nunn, Darren Barr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wade v. United States of America et al
as 4:2023cv00385
Plaintiff:
Ronald G Wade, Jr
Defendant:
United States of America, State of Oklahoma, City of Tulsa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wade v. United States of America et al
as 4:2022cv00209
Plaintiff:
Ronald Gene Wade, Jr
Defendant:
United Sates of America, State of Oklahoma, City of Tulsa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Webster et al v. Garland et al
as 6:2021cv00119
Plaintiff:
Paul Leroy Wickham, Dwayne Marvin Garrett and Shirley Dione Webster
Defendant:
Jim Felte, Christopher Wray, Claire V. Eagan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pontious v. Trainor et al
as 5:2021cv00088
Plaintiff:
Glen A Pontious
Defendant:
Maxine Waters, James E Trainor, lll, Nancy Pelosi and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv00036
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv00037
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv00012
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv00011
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
