Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Diggs v. Board of Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv00353
Plaintiff:
Nathan Daniel Diggs
Defendant:
Board of Corrections, Robin Sandy, Caroling Melinie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baccus v. Board of Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv00351
Plaintiff:
Thomas Baccus, Jr
Defendant:
Board of Corrections, Robin Sandy, Caroling Melinie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newman v. Board of Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv00354
Plaintiff:
James Earl Newman
Defendant:
Brent Reinke, Pam Sonnen, Joanna Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beeson v. Board of Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv00352
Plaintiff:
Milo Beeson
Defendant:
Board of Corrections, Robin Sandy, Caroling Melinie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Idaho Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv00028
Plaintiff:
Dana Lydell Smith
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Corrections, Paul Panther, Idaho Correctional Center (CCA) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darnell Dukes v. V. Lizaola, et al
as 10-17805
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARNELL DUKES
Defendant - Appellee:
V. LIZAOLA, K. NEWBY, M. BARROSO and others
Searcy v. Thomas et al
as 1:2010cv00294
Plaintiff:
Barry Searcy
Defendant:
Martin Thomas, Kelly Brown, Terry Knapp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wood et al v. Board of Corrections et al
as 1:2010cv00277
Plaintiff:
Lance Conway Wood, James Earl Newman, Thomas Baccus, Jr and others
Defendant:
Board of Corrections, Robin Sandy, Caroling Melinie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayra Aguilar et al v Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 5:2010cv00601
Defendant:
ACF Industries Inc, AG Processing Inc, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Mayra Aguilar, Amelia Alvarado, Ana Alvarado and others
Betancourt v. Barroso et al
as 1:2010cv00164
Plaintiff:
Aniceto Betancourt
Defendant:
Diana Barroso, Yurianna Barroso, Alfonso Barroso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
