Cases 1 - 10 of 145
Minnfee v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv02643
Petitioner:
Barry Dwayne Minnfee
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Minnfee v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2023cv00466
Petitioner:
Barry Dwayne Minnfee
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barry Minnfee v. Texas Innocence Project, et al
as 20-10327
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFF BLACKBURN, Director, MASS, INCORPORATED, JIMMIE SMITH, Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BARRY DWAYNE MINNFEE
Minnfee v. Robinson et al
as 5:2020cv00062
Defendant:
Julie Alexander, Elbert Holmes, Chairman Parole and others
Plaintiff:
Barry Dwayne Minnfee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Minnfee v. TX Innocence Project et al
as 5:2019cv00267
Defendant:
TX Innocence Project, Joyce Ann Brown, Ms. NFN Blackburn and others
Plaintiff:
Barry Dwayne Minnfee and Barry Dwayne Minnlee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Minnfee v. Dumbald et al
as 1:2018cv00137
Defendant:
FNU Roberts, Edward Pharr, Dr Lannette Linthicum and others
Plaintiff:
Barry Dwayne Minnfee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Minnfee v. Terrall et al
as 1:2018cv00136
Defendant:
Cathy Young, Texas Medical Board, Gloria Torres and others
Plaintiff:
Barry Dwayne Minnfee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Minnfee v. Bartley et al
as 5:2018cv00194
Defendant:
T. Cline, Dr Lannette Linthicum, NFN Parker and others
Plaintiff:
Barry Dwayne Minnfee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Minnfee v. Brown et al
as 5:2018cv00154
Plaintiff:
Barry Dwayne Minnfee
Defendant:
Joseph Bernard Marsh, Brian W. Sifford, Daniel Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Minnfee v. Holmes et al
as 5:2018cv00153
Defendant:
Paul NLN, Joseph Bernard Marsh, Elbert Holmes and others
Plaintiff:
Barry Dwayne Minnfee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
