Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Soto v. Baxter Healthcare Corp. et al
as 3:2023cv01002
Plaintiff:
Matthew Soto
Defendant:
Baxter Healthcare Corp. and DOES 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Justin Hopkins v. Baxter Healthcare Corp. et al
as 2:2022cv05782
Plaintiff:
Justin Hopkins
Defendant:
Baxter Healthcare Corp., Hill-Rom Company, Inc., an Indiana corporation, Jose Almeida and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Danilo Lomibao et al v. Baxter Healthcare Corp et al
as 2:2013cv01789
Defendant:
Baxter Healthcare Corp and Does
Plaintiff:
Danilo Cruz Lomibao and Roselee Lomibao
Damon Lee v. Baxter Healthcare Corp et al
as 2:2013cv01494
Defendant:
Baxter Healthcare Corp, Baxter International Inc and Does
Plaintiff:
Damon Lee
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02126
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dunn v. Endoscopy Center of Southern Nevada, LLC et al
as 2:2011cv00560
Plaintiff:
Maria L. Ambriz, Robin Armstrong, Doris Artica and others
Defendant:
Baxter Healthcare Corp., Dipak Desai, M.D., Dipak Desai, M.D., P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
McFarland v. APP Pharmaceuticals LLC, et al
as 2:2010cv01746
Defendant:
Cardinal Health 110 Inc, Celgene Corporation, APP Pharmaceuticals LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Laurel McFarland and Rodney McFarland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Mary E Buggs v. Antelope Valley Cancer Center et al
as 2:2010cv04382
Defendant:
American Capital Ltd, Antelope Valley Cancer Center, Antelope Valley Hospital and others
Plaintiff:
Mary E Buggs
Jose Felix v. Baxter Healthcare Corp. et al
as 2:2009cv06459
Plaintiff:
Jose Felix
Defendant:
Baxter Healthcare Corp., Baxter Healthcare Corp. and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
