Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00354
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Lexington Insurance Company v. Baylor University
as 6:2023cv00016
Plaintiff:
Lexington Insurance Company
Defendant:
Baylor University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02850
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv01155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX of the Education Amendment of 1972
Manning v. Baylor University et al
as 6:2022cv01085
Plaintiff:
Emma Manning
Defendant:
Baylor University and Richard Wayne Easley doing business as Stonegate Stables
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Peters et al v. Baylor College of Medicine et al
as 3:2022cv01854
Plaintiff:
Michael Geoffrey Peters
Defendant:
Baylor College of Medicine, Baylor University and Baylor Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Baylor University
as 6:2022cv00195
Plaintiff:
Eva Mitchell
Defendant:
Baylor University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Baylor University v. Baylor Youth Foundation, Inc.
as 6:2021cv00992
Plaintiff:
Baylor University
Defendant:
Baylor Youth Foundation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
