Cases 31 - 40 of 232
IN RE: BAYSIDE LITIGATION (CHARLES WRENN)
as 1:2011cv04036
Pecial_master:
JOHN W. BISSELL
Defendant:
BAYSIDE STATE PRISON , ROBERT ROES 1 TO 50 , JOHN SMITHS 1 TO 15 and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES WRENN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Bayside State Prison Li
as 11-2895
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADRIAN TORRES
Defendant - Appellee:
BAYSIDE STATE PRISON
IN RE: BAYSIDE LITIGATION (OTTO KRUPP)
as 1:2011cv04035
Pecial_master:
JOHN W. BISSELL
Defendant:
BAYSIDE STATE PRISON , ROBERT ROES 1 TO 50 , JOHN SMITHS 1 TO 15 and others
Plaintiff:
OTTO KRUPP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IN RE: BAYSIDE LITIGATION (ERVAN CRIBB)
as 1:2011cv04033
Pecial_master:
JOHN W. BISSELL
Defendant:
BAYSIDE STATE PRISON , ROBERT ROES 1 TO 50 , JOHN SMITHS 1 TO 15 and others
Plaintiff:
ERVAN CRIBB
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marco Mendez v. Bayside State Prison
as 11-2657
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCO MENDEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
BAYSIDE STATE PRISON
GREEN v. BAYSIDE STATE PRISON et al
as 1:2011cv01833
Plaintiff:
DAVID L. GREEN
Defendant:
BAYSIDE STATE PRISON, SCO PEPPER, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
InRe:Bayside Prison Litigation
as 11-1714
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY MORTON
Defendant - Appellee:
BAYSIDE STATE PRISON
IN RE: BAYSIDE LITIGATION (ERROLL BURNETT)
as 1:2011cv01471
Pecial_master:
JOHN W. BISSELL
Defendant:
BAYSIDE STATE PRISON , ROBERT ROES 1 TO 50 , JOHN SMITHS 1 TO 15 and others
Plaintiff:
ERROLL BURNETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IN RE: BAYSIDE LITIGATION (HARASHE ABDULLAH)
as 1:2011cv00460
Pecial_master:
JOHN W. BISSELL
Defendant:
BAYSIDE STATE PRISON , ROBERT ROES 1 TO 50 , JOHN SMITHS 1 TO 15 and others
Plaintiff:
HARASHE ABDULLAH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
InRe:Bayside Prison Litigation
as 10-4719
Defendant - Appellee:
In re: BAYSIDE STATE PRISON, WILLIAM FAUVER, GARY HILTON and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALVIN THORNTON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
