Cases 81 - 90 of 107
COX v. JUUL LABS, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv01523
Defendant:
JUUL LABS, INC. and PAX LABS, INC.
Plaintiff:
THOMAS COX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CENTRAL BUCKS SCHOOL DISTRICT BUCKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA v. JUUL LABS, INC.
as 2:2019cv05465
Defendant:
JUUL LABS, INC.
Plaintiff:
CENTRAL BUCKS SCHOOL DISTRICT BUCKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
KUFRO v. JUUL LABS, INC. et al
as 5:2019cv05259
Defendant:
JUUL LABS, INC., PAX LABS, INC., ALTRIA GROUP, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
CHAD KUFRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
QUAKERTOWN COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT BUCKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA v. JUUL LABS, INC.
as 2:2019cv05135
Defendant:
JUUL LABS, INC.
Plaintiff:
QUAKERTOWN COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT BUCKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
FERRARO v. JUUL LABS INC. et al
as 2:2019cv04979
Defendant:
ABC CORPORATION #1-25, JANE ROES #1-25, JOHN DOES #1-25 and others
Plaintiff:
GIOVANNI FERRARO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHARGEL et al v. JUUL LABS INC. et al
as 2:2019cv04978
Defendant:
ABC CORPORATION #1-25, JOHN DOES #1-25, JUUL LABS INC. and others
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH SHARGEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
S.S. et al v. JUUL LABS, INC et al
as 5:2019cv04820
Defendant:
PAX LABS, INC. and JUUL LABS, INC
Plaintiff:
K.S. and S.S.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GLUCH v. JUUL LABS, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv04821
Defendant:
DOES 1-10, PHILLIP MORRIS, USA, INC., JUUL LABS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
JASON GLUCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LAPLANTE v. JUUL LABS, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv04828
Defendant:
JUUL LABS, INC., PAX LABS, INC., PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
THEODORE LAPLANTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MAYS v. JUUL LABS, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv01268
Defendant:
JUUL LABS, INC., JOHN DOES 1-100 and ALTRIA GROUP, INC.
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY MAYS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
