Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv05169
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Mark Shoemaker v. USA, et al
as 18-55346
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK ALAN SHOEMAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ALFRED H. SIEGEL, ANTHONY FRIEDMAN and others
In re: Mark Shoemaker, et al v. Alfred Siegel, et al
as 18-55182
Debtor:
In the Matter of: MARK ALAN SHOEMAKER
Appellant:
MARK ALAN SHOEMAKER
Appellee:
ALFRED H. SIEGEL, Chapter 7 Trustee, ANTHONY FRIEDMAN, BRET D. LEWIS and others
Mark Alan Shoemaker v. United States of America et al
as 2:2018cv00615
Defendant:
Peter Anderson, Gary Baddin, Bender, Yoo and Brill, L.L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Alan Shoemaker
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02033
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Howard L Abselet v. Levene Neale Bender Yoo and Brill L.L.P. et al
as 2:2016cv06263
Plaintiff:
Howard L Abselet
Defendant:
Simon Barlava, Carla Ridge, Inc., Desert Field LLC and others
Howard L Abselet v. Alliance Lending Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00815
Defendant:
Hamid Nourmand, Hamid Joseph Nourmand, Does 1-10, inclusive and others
Petitioner:
Non-Party Encino Corporate Plaza, L.P., Fereydoun Dayani, Levene Neale Bender Yoo and Brill L.L.P. and others
Cross Claimant:
Malibu Reconveyance, LLC
Respondent:
Pine West Holding, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant:
Roxanna Aboudi, LPS Agency Sales and Posting, Inc., Raymond Yashouafar and others
Cross Defendant:
DOES 1-10 inclusive
Not Classified By Court:
WhiteRock Realty Solutions, Inc.
Interested Party:
Hertzel Illulian and Encino - 16661 Ventura Blvd Trust, a Delaware statutory trust
Plaintiff:
Howard L Abselet
Trustee:
David Keith Gottlieb
Receiver:
William J Hoffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
