Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Northern New England Telephone Operations, LLC et al v. Level 3 Communications, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv01119
Plaintiff:
Northern New England Telephone Operations LLC , Telephone Operating Company of Vermont LLC , Bentleyville Communications Corporation and others
Defendant:
Level 3 Communications LLC, Wiltel Communications LLC, Global Crossing Telecommunications Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Northern New England Telephone Operations, LLC et al v. Level 3 Communications, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv00579
Plaintiff:
Northern New England Telephone Operations LLC , Telephone Operating Company of Vermont LLC , Bentleyville Communications Corporation and others
Defendant:
Level 3 Communications, LLC., Wiltel Communications, LLC, Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MCI Communications Services Inc et al v. Armstrong Telecommunications Inc et al
as 3:2015cv00228
Plaintiff:
MCI Communications Services Inc and Verizon Select Services Inc
Defendant:
Armstrong Telecommunications Inc , Armstrong Telephone Company of Maryland , Armstrong Telephone Company and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 206
MCI COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INC. et al v. ARMSTRONG TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. et al
as PAW/1:14-cv-00240
Plaintiff:
MCI Communications Services, Inc. and Verizon Select Services Inc.
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. , ARMSTRONG TELEPHONE COMPANY OF MARYLAND , ARMSTRONG TELEPHONE COMPANY and others
MCI COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INC. et al v. ARMSTRONG TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv00240
Plaintiff:
MCI COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INC. and VERIZON SELECT SERVICES INC.
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC., ARMSTRONG TELEPHONE COMPANY OF MARYLAND, ARMSTRONG TELEPHONE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
