Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Michael Rose, et al v. NCAA, et al
as 24-8010
Petitioner: MICHAEL ROSE and TIMOTHY STRATTON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Respondent: NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION and BIG TEN CONFERENCE
Carter et al v. National Collegiate Athletic Association et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as CAN/3:23-CV-06325
Plaintiff: Carter, DeWayne Carter, Nya Harrison and others
Defendant: National Collegiate Athletic Association, Atlantic Coast Conference, The Big Ten Conference, Inc. and others
Carter et al v. National Collegiate Athletic Association et al
as 3:2023cv06325
Plaintiff: DeWayne Carter, Nya Harrison and Sedona Prince
Defendant: National Collegiate Athletic Association, Atlantic Coast Conference, The Big Ten Conference, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Fontenot v. National Collegiate Athletic Association et al
as CO/1:23-CV-03076
Plaintiff: Fontenot and Alex Fontenot
Defendant: National Collegiate Athletic Association, Pac-12 Conference, Southeastern Conference and others
Fontenot v. National Collegiate Athletic Association et al
as 1:2023cv03076
Plaintiff: Alex Fontenot
Defendant: National Collegiate Athletic Association, Southeastern Conference, Pac-12 Conference and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
House, et al. v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, et al.
as 23-3607
Respondent: GRANT HOUSE, SEDONA PRINCE, CHUBA HUBBARD and others
Petitioner: NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, PAC-12 CONFERENCE, THE BIG TEN CONFERENCE, INC. and others
In re College Athlete NIL Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2020cv03919
Plaintiff: Grant House, Sedona Prince, Chuba Hubbard and others
Defendant: The Big Ten Conference, Inc., The Big Twelve Conference, Inc., National Collegiate Athletic Association and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Tymir Oliver
Not Classified By Court: Electronic Arts Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Hubbard et al v. National Collegiate Athletic Association et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv01593
Plaintiff: Chuba Hubbard and Keira McCarrell
Defendant: National Collegiate Athletic Association, Atlantic Coast Conference, The Big Ten Conference, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Keller v. Electronic Arts Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2009cv01967
Not Classified By Court: SEC, Non-Party XOS Technologies, Inc., The Big Ten Conference, Inc. and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Samuel Jacobson, Danny Wimprine, Craig Newsome and others
Interested Party: Timothy J McIlwain, Pac-12 Conference, James E. Delany and others
Amicus Curiae: A&E Television Networks, LLC, James Brown, First Amendment Coalition and others
Plaintiff: Michael E. Davis, Michael Anderson, Samuel Michael Keller and others
Intervenor: Ramzi Yusef, Edward Breivik, James E. Holmes and others
Petitioner: Nicholas Kindler
Defendant: Collegiate Licensing Company, National Collegiate Athletic Association and Electronic Arts Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
In re: Shawne Alston, et al v. NCAA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-15566
Plaintiff / Appellee: KENDALL TIMMONS, ALEX LAURICELLA, INDIA CHANEY and others
Defendant / Appellant: THE BIG TEN CONFERENCE, INC., NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, The NCAA, MOUNTAIN WEST CONFERENCE and others
Not Classified By Court: In re: NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION ATHLETIC GRANT-IN-AID CAP ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Intervenor: AMERICAN BROADCASTING COMPANIES, INC., CBS BROADCASTING, INC., ESPN ENTERPRISES, INC. and others
Amicus Curiae: NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE PLAYERS ASSOCIATION, THE NATIONAL BASKETBALL PLAYERS ASSOCIATION, NATIONAL FEDERATION OF STATE HIGH SCHOOL ASSOCIATIONS and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?