Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Bridges et al v. Chevron Phillips Chemical Company, LP et al
as 3:2013cv00477
Defendant:
Chevron Phillips Chemical Company, LP As successor in Interest to Phillips Chemical Company formerly known as ConocoPhillips also known as Phillips 66 Company doing business as Drilling Specialties Company, Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, Inc., Union Carbide Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
David Bridges, John Courtney, Jerry Freeman, Sr. and others
Not Classified By Court:
David C. Gibbons and David Y. Lamm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Burnett et al v. Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC et al
as 3:2011cv01059
Plaintiff:
Truman Burnett and Bonnie Burnett
Defendant:
Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC , Chesapeake Energy Corporation , Nomac Drilling, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cooper v. Baker Hughes Incorporated, et al
as 11-6128
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SKYE COOPER, as the surviving spouse of Aaron Cooper, deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
BAKER HUGHES INCORPORATED and BJ SERVICES COMPANY USA
Hixson v. Dew et al
as 2:2011cv02088
Plaintiff:
Richard Hixson
Defendant:
Charles Dew , Dew Farms, Inc. , Tyler Berends and others
Cross_claimant:
BJ Services Company, USA
Cross_defendant:
Charles Dew and Dew Farms, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cooper v. Baker Hughes Incorporated et al
as 5:2010cv01167
Plaintiff:
Skye Cooper
Defendant:
Baker Hughes Incorporated and BJ Services Company USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kelly, et al v. Union Pacific, et al
as 10-8063
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLINTON KELLY and JULIE KELLY
Defendant - Appellee:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY and BJ SERVICES COMPANY USA
JMA Energy Company LLC et al v. BJ Services Company USA
as 5:2008cv00738
Plaintiff:
JMA Energy Company LLC, JMA Energy Company LLC, JMA Energy Company LLC and others
Defendant:
BJ Services Company USA and BJ Services Company USA
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
