Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Cascadia Wildlands et al v. BLM
as 1:2024cv00517
Plaintiff: Cascadia Wildlands, Oregon Wild and Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center
Defendant: BLM
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
ONDA, et al v. BLM, et al
as 23-35461
Plaintiff / Appellee: OREGON NATURAL DESERT ASSOCIATION, AUDUBON SOCIETY OF PORTLAND and DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE
Defendant / Appellant: BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and BARRY BUSHUE, State Director, BLM Oregon/Washington
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: CAHILL RANCHES, INC., an Oregon corporation, ROCKING CLUB CATTLE, LLC, V BOX LAND & LIVESTOCK, INC. and others
Reno-Sparks Indian Colony, et al v. Deb Haaland, et al
as 23-15780
Plaintiff / Appellant: RENO-SPARKS INDIAN COLONY, SUMMIT LAKE PAIUTE TRIBE and BURNS PAIUTE TRIBE
Defendant / Appellee: DEB HAALAND, Secretary of the Interior, ANNE-MARIE SHARKEY, Acting Director of tje BLM Winnemucca District Office and KATHLEEN REHBERG, Field Manager of the BLM Winnemucca District Humboldt River Field Office
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: LITHIUM NEVADA CORP.
ONDA, et al v. BLM, et al
as 23-35109
Plaintiff / Appellee: OREGON NATURAL DESERT ASSOCIATION, AUDUBON SOCIETY OF PORTLAND and DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE
Defendant: BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, THERESA M. HANLEY, State Director, BLM Oregon/Washington, DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: CAHILL RANCHES, INC., an Oregon corporation, MACKENZIE RANCH, LLC, LAIRD LAND COMPANY, LLC and others
ONDA, et al v. BLM, et al
as 23-35101
Plaintiff / Appellee: OREGON NATURAL DESERT ASSOCIATION, AUDUBON SOCIETY OF PORTLAND and DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE
Defendant: BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, THERESA M. HANLEY, State Director, BLM Oregon/Washington, DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: MACKENZIE RANCH, LLC, LAIRD LAND COMPANY, LLC, COW CREEK RANCH, INC. and others
Ginger Kathrens, et al v. Scott de la Vega, et al
as 21-35094
Plaintiff / Appellee: CLOUD FOUNDATION, AMERICAN WILD HORSE CAMPAIGN, GINGER KATHRENS and others
Defendant / Appellant: JEFFREY ROSE, in his official capacity as District Manager of the BLM Burns District Office;, BARRY BUSHUE, in his official capacity as the State Director for BLM Oregon, SCOTT DE LA VEGA, Secretary, Department of the Interior and others
KANAM v. SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv02322
Defendant: SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, OFFICE OF ALASKA REGIONAL BLM and OFFICE OF VERONICA LARVIE
Plaintiff: KURT KANAM
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
ONDA v. Jeff Rose, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-35641
Defendant / Appellee: BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, INTERIOR BOARD OF LAND APPEALS, RHONDA KARGES, Field Manager, Andrews Resource Area, BLM and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: HARNEY COUNTY
Plaintiff / Appellant: OREGON NATURAL DESERT ASSOCIATION
Wu v. Bernhardt, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-2067
Defendant / Appellee: DAVID BERNHARDT, Secretary, of the United States Department of Interior, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, Bureau of Land Management and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: LIMING WU
K. Corrigan, et al v. David Bernhardt, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-35393
Plaintiff / Appellant: HANLEY RANCH PARTNERSHIP, MICHAEL F. HANLEY IV, K. JOHN CORRIGAN and others
Defendant / Appellee: DONN CHRISTIANSEN, Owyhee Field Office Manager in his official capacity as manager for the Owyhee FO of the Boise District of the BLM, JOHN RUHS, Idaho State Director of the BLM, WILLIAM PERRY PENDLETON, Director of the BLM and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?