Cases 31 - 40 of 60
Blu Products, Inc. et al v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00458
Plaintiff:
Blu Products, Inc. and CT Miami, LLC
Defendant:
LG Electronics, Inc. , LG Electronics Alabama, Inc. and LG Electronics Mobilecomm U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Blue Sky Networks, LLC v. BLU Products, Inc.
as 6:2017cv00263
Plaintiff:
Blue Sky Networks, LLC
Defendant:
BLU Products INc. , Huawei Device USA, Inc. and Huawei Device Co. Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Darren Martinez, et al v. Blu Products, Inc., et al
as 2:2017cv02507
Defendant:
Blu Products, Inc. and Shanghai Adups Technology Co., Ltd..
Plaintiff:
Darren Martinez and Joe Mocnik
LG Electronics, Inc. v. BLU Products, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00327
Plaintiff:
LG Electronics, Inc.
Defendant:
BLU Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Blue Sky Networks, LLC v. BLU Products, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00125
Defendant:
BLU Products, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Blue Sky Networks, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Display Technologies, LLC v. Blu Products, Inc.
as 2:2017cv00067
Plaintiff:
Display Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
Blu Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Aguilar v. BLU Products, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv25131
Plaintiff:
Vincent Aguilar
Defendant:
BLU Products, Inc. and ADUPS USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511
Darren Martinez v. Blu Products, Inc.
as 2:2016cv08941
Defendant:
Adups USA LLC, Blu Products, Inc. and Shanghai Adups Technology, Co., LTD
Plaintiff:
Darren Martinez and Joe Mocnik
Bonds v. Blu Products, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv24892
Plaintiff:
Aaron Bonds
Defendant:
Blu Products, Inc., Shanghai Adups Technology Co., Ltd. and Adups USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511
Alex is the Best, LLC v. BLU Products, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00769
Plaintiff:
Alex is the Best, LLC
Defendant:
BLU Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
