Cases 11 - 20 of 272
Moreira v. Societe Generale, S.A.
as 23-568
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Juan B. Pujol Moreira, as Personal Representative and Administrator of the Estate of Nieves Pujol, AKA Nieves Moreira Martinez
Defendant / Appellee:
Societe Generale, S.A.
Defendant:
BNP Paribas, S.A.
Pujol Moreira v. Societe Generale, S.A.
as 23-394
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Maria Julia Pujol Moreira, Ines Maria Pujol Faget, as Personal Representative and Executor of the Estate of Arcadio Joaquin Pujol Izquierdo, Sara L. Pujol, as Personal Representative and Administrator of the Estate of Laureano Pujol Rojas and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Societe Generale, S.A. and BNP Paribas, S.A.
Zaerpour et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv00040
Plaintiff:
Soheil Zaerpour and The People of the United States of America
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Barclays Bank plc and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
UBS Group AG
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Zaerpour v. UBS Group AG et al
as 1:2022cv07232
Plaintiff:
Scheil Zaerpour and Soheil Zaerpour
Defendant:
UBS Group AG, Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lavi v. BNP Paribas Brach et al
as 1:2022cv06922
Plaintiff:
Pierre Lavi
Defendant:
BNP Paribas Brach and MBassy of Marroc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
In re: Treasury Securities Auc
as 22-943
Plaintiff:
Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, Beaver County Employees' Retirement Fund, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Marc Federighi, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Michael St. John, BNP Paribas Securities Corp., Bank of Nova Scotia, New York Agency and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
City of Pontiac Police and Fire Retirement System, On behalf of itself and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Pension Fund, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Health and Welfare Fund, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
BMO Capital Markets Corp., CIBC World Markets Corp., Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Contant v. Bank of America Corporation
as 22-159
Plaintiff / Appellee:
James Contant, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Martin-Han Tran, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Carlos Gonzalez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
AMA Capital Management, LLC
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Petitioner:
FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD)
Contant v. Bank of America Corporation
as 22-19
Plaintiff / Appellee:
James Contant, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Martin-Han Tran, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Carlos Gonzalez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
AMA Capital Management, LLC
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Petitioner:
FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD)
Contant v. Bank of America Corporation
as 21-3058
Plaintiff / Appellee:
James Contant, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Martin-Han Tran, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Carlos Gonzalez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
AMA Capital Management, LLC
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Petitioner:
FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
