Other Statutes Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 102
Smith, et al v. FRS
as 21-9538
Petitioner: MARK A. KOLBASA and FRANK E. SMITH
Respondent: BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Karen Baylor v. Jerome Powell
as 20-5176
Defendant / Appellee: Jerome Powell, Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
Plaintiff / Appellant: Karen Baylor
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
as 1:2020cv01322
Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Plaintiff: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
GOLDSTEIN v. BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
as 1:2020cv00084
Defendant: BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Plaintiff: ROMAN GOLDSTEIN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Junk v. Board of Governors of the Fede
as 19-3606
Plaintiff / Appellee: Daniel L. Junk
Defendant / Appellant: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
Junk v. Board of Governors
as 19-3125
Plaintiff / Appellant: Daniel L. Junk
Defendant / Appellee: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
Edward Richardson v. Jerome Powell
as 19-5119
Plaintiff / Appellant: Edward Richardson
Defendant / Appellee: Jerome Powell, Chair, Federal Reserve Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
MORLEY v. BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
as 1:2019cv00797
Plaintiff: JEFFERSON MORLEY
Defendant: BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Junk v. Board Of Governors Of The Federal Reserve System. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00385
Defendant: Board Of Governors Of The Federal Reserve System.
Plaintiff: Daniel L. Junk
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Jiampietro v. Board of Governors
as 18-1989
Petitioner: Joseph Jiampietro
Respondent: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?