Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Denney (PS) v. BOP Designation & Sentence Computation Center
as 1:2024cv00006
Petitioner:
Lucas Denney
Respondent:
BOP Designation & Sentence Computation Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Palmera Pineda v. Garland et al
as 1:2022cv00193
Plaintiff:
Juvenal Ovidio Palmera Pineda, Juvenal Ovidio Ricardo Palmera Pineda and Simon Trinidad
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP), John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
York v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, The et al
as 1:2021cv01503
Defendant:
J. Fox, Chris Synsvoll, SIS Tech Kerri Lewis-Hicks and others
Plaintiff:
Dwight D. York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnett v. USA et al
as 1:2021cv01340
Defendant:
George Santini, Hector Lozano, Larry Hudson and others
Plaintiff:
Tracy Alan Barnett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kowalczyk v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2021cv00950
Defendant:
Administrative Remedy Coordinator of Florence FCC/USP, Health Services Dept. of BOP, US Marshal Service and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Kowalczyk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Koch v. Marquette et al
as 1:2021cv00781
Defendant:
Marquette, True, BOP and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Koch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2020cv02830
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, B. True, Harley Lappin and others
Petitioner:
David Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Baxter-Bosdale v. USA et al
as 1:2020cv00599
Plaintiff:
Richard Antonio-Hill Baxter-Bosdale
Defendant:
No Named Defendants, BOP Government, The and USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vianez v. BOP et al
as 1:2018cv02297
Defendant:
BOP and Denver Court Mayor
Plaintiff:
Juan Vianez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fogle v. Walton-Pratt et al
as 1:2018cv00704
Petitioner:
Jared S. Fogle
Respondent:
Tanya Walton-Pratt, Donald Trump, R. Hudgins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
