Cases 1 - 10 of 22
RONEY v. BUREAU OF PRISONS (BOP) et al
as 2:2024cv00888
Plaintiff:
RASHAD RONEY
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS (BOP), NJ DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MEDICAL DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BANKS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2022cv00538
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, BOP NATIONAL LOCKDOWN, MICHAEL CARJAVAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
AIGBEKAEN v. ORTIZ et al
as 1:2019cv22115
Respondent:
MS. RIVERA, AW SMITH, SOLICITOR GENERAL and others
Petitioner:
RAYMOND AIGBEKAEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LEWIS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2018cv13393
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, MARK S INCH and ACTING DIRECTOR OF BOP
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WAYNE LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VIOLETTE v. ORTIZ et al
as 1:2017cv05030
Plaintiff:
GREGORY PAUL VIOLETTE
Defendant:
DAVID E. ORTIZ, GENERAL COUNSEL, FEDERAL BOP and US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITE v. NORWOOD et al
as 1:2016cv04168
Plaintiff:
ROGER WHITE
Defendant:
NORWOOD, LAZURUS, GILLISPIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARTER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2014cv04741
Plaintiff:
KEVIN CARTER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JONATHAN C. MINER, J.T. SHARTLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DULANEY v. NORWOOD et al
as 1:2014cv04222
Petitioner:
MATTHEW LEE DULANEY
Respondent:
J.L. NORWOOD , J. HOLLINGSWORTH and POSSIBLE UNKNOWN BOP STAFF MEMBERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MCKNIGHT v. BOP OFFICE THAT MADE A BARDEN DETERMINATION
as 2:2014cv04063
Petitioner:
RICCARDO MCKNIGHT
Respondent:
BOP OFFICE THAT MADE A BARDEN DETERMINATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BUSSIE v. ORTIZ et al
as 1:2014cv03997
Petitioner:
ANTHONY BUSSIE
Respondent:
DAVID ORTIZ , BOP , TREASURER FINANCIAL CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
