Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Solomon v. Exicutive Office US Marshals et al
as 1:2011cv01350
Respondent:
Director BOP, Exicutive Office US Marshals, GEO Group and others
Petitioner:
Channing Solomon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Banks v. Marantz et al
as 9:2011cv00292
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Dr. Marantz, Fischer, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chukhray v. Execitove Pffoce US Attorney et al
as 1:2011cv01118
Petitioner:
Pavel Chukhray
Respondent:
DHO Garcia, Director of BOP, Execitove Pffoce US Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Darden v. BOP Director Lapin et al
as 1:2010cv04941
Respondent:
BOP Director Lapin, Warden FCI and Warden MDC
Petitioner:
Kevin Darden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Urena v. Wolfson et al
as 1:2009cv01107
Plaintiff:
Jose Rafael Urena
Defendant:
Yan Wolfson, New York Downtown Hospital, Robert Beaudouin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Urena v. Wolfson et al
as 1:2009cv01658
Plaintiff:
Jose Rafael Urena
Defendant:
Yan Wolfson, New York Downtown Hospital, Robert Beaudouin and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McDowall v. MCC-BOP-NYC et al
as 1:2008cv08787
Plaintiff:
Maurice McDowall
Defendant:
MCC-BOP-NYC, Matos-Sackos, Rocky Dowd and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Melendez v. Shoemaker et al
as 1:2008cv06661
Plaintiff:
Luis Melendez
Defendant:
Shoemaker, Federal Correctional Institution, Unknown Mailroom Officer(s) and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Vernon v. BOP (MDC Brooklyn) et al
as 1:2008cv01634
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Vernon
Defendant:
BOP (MDC Brooklyn), John Doe 1,2,3 and C.M. Strickland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gil v. BOP et al
as 1:2007cv02728
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Gil
Defendant:
BOP, GEO and Reeves County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
