Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Little v. United States of America - B.O.P et al
as 1:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Randall Little
Defendant:
United States of America - B.O.P, C Stern, Dr. FNU Winger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mobley v. Warden Garrett et al
as 4:2023cv03481
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Mobley
Defendant:
Warden Garrett, Mrs. Nichols, Dept. of Justice-DOJ Director and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Carr v. BOP
as 4:2023cv00447
Plaintiff:
Michael Joseph Carr
Defendant:
BOP, C.E.O FMC Fort Worth, Heriberto H. Tellez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rafalko v. Garrido
as 4:2023cv00189
Petitioner:
Anthony Rafalko
Respondent:
BOP and Freddy Garrido
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Patterson v. Garza et al
as 3:2022cv02678
Plaintiff:
Jayleen Patterson
Defendant:
P Garza and BOP Seagoville FCI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. BOP et al
as 3:2022cv02395
Plaintiff:
Kevin Wayne Davis
Defendant:
BOP, DOJ and Seagoville FCI Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prigmore v. FCI Beaumont Staff
as 1:2022cv00418
Plaintiff:
William Prigmore
Defendant:
FCI Beaumont Staff, Bryan K. Dobbs, Multiple Unknown Agents of the BOP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Godwin v. McLarty et al
as 1:2022cv00392
Plaintiff:
Roger Godwin
Defendant:
FNU McLarty, BOP Director and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Godwin v. BOP Director et al
as 1:2022cv00388
Plaintiff:
Roger Godwin
Defendant:
BOP Director, Dr. Luis Ramos, FNU Franks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Vital v. Director Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2022cv00106
Plaintiff:
Jackson Ruben Vital
Defendant:
Director Federal Bureau of Prisons, Warden USP Beaumont, Captain USP Beaumont and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
