Cases 11 - 20 of 65
Godwin v. McLarty et al
as 1:2022cv00392
Plaintiff:
Roger Godwin
Defendant:
FNU McLarty, BOP Director and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Godwin v. BOP Director et al
as 1:2022cv00388
Plaintiff:
Roger Godwin
Defendant:
BOP Director, Dr. Luis Ramos, FNU Franks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00057
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Vital v. Director Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2022cv00106
Plaintiff:
Jackson Ruben Vital
Defendant:
Director Federal Bureau of Prisons, Warden USP Beaumont, Captain USP Beaumont and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowman v. Administratrive Remedy Coordinator
as 1:2022cv00082
Plaintiff:
James . Bowman
Defendant:
Administratrive Remedy Coordinator, Warden, FCI Beaumont Low Camp, Administrative Beaumont Camp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fields v. Director Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2021cv00464
Plaintiff:
Sherman Lamont Fields
Defendant:
Director Federal Bureau of Prisons, Director Health Services Division BOP, Warden USP Beaumont and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Norman v. Carr et al
as 4:2021cv00669
Defendant:
Michael Carr, Dr. Charles Langham, Michael Carvajal and others
Plaintiff:
Alexis C Norman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrison v. Carr et al
as 4:2021cv00488
Defendant:
Warden FNU Carr, BOP, Warden Carr and others
Plaintiff:
Leslie Garrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Durio v. Federal Bureau of Prisons "BOP"
as 4:2020cv01334
Petitioner:
Cliff A. Durio
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons "BOP"
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Albarran v. Warden, Giles Dalby CI
as 5:2020cv00202
Respondent:
United States of America, BOP and Warden, Giles Dalby CI
Petitioner:
Israel Albarran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
