Cases 21 - 30 of 75
Johnson v. Terry et al
as 1:2019cv01694
Defendant:
Jane Does, D.J. Harmon, Darlene Drew and others
Plaintiff:
LaQuan Stederick Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01293
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Philippeaux v. United States of America et al
as 5:2019cv00094
Defendant:
US Dept of Justice, U.S Attorney's Office, FCC Coleman Low and others
Plaintiff:
Philander Philippeaux
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Pippins v. BOP Employee
as 1:2019cv00109
Defendant:
BOP Employee
Petitioner:
Montavious Pippins
Respondent:
Warden B.H. Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Witte v. U.S. Government BOP
as 2:2018cv00672
Defendant:
U.S. Government BOP
Plaintiff:
Gerhard Witte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alvarez v. United States BOP et al
as 1:2018cv04785
Petitioner:
Victor Alvarez
Respondent:
United States BOP and Viviana Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Stephen Cometa v. John Doe, et al
as 18-13242
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN COMETA
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN DOE, Marion County Sheriff, JOHN 1-10 DOES, Marion Co./Seminole Co. Bradford Co. U.S.Marshals Service, and BOP Officials and officers/employees, JOHN DOES 1-4, Marion Co./Seminole Co. Bradford Co. and BOP Staff/employees and others
Lobacz v. The United States of America et al
as 0:2018cv61737
Plaintiff:
Frank M Lobacz
Defendant:
The United States of America and Bureau of Prisons (BOP) Medical and Other Staff John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv22015
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mack v. Qadri et al
as 1:2018cv02161
Plaintiff:
Larry Mack
Defendant:
Dr. Qadri, Warden D.J. Harmon, Nurse O. Hollinger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
