Cases 31 - 40 of 97
Dembry v. U.S. Probation Office et al
as 4:2020cv00354
Petitioner:
Edward Keith Dembry
Respondent:
B.O.P., U.S. Probation Office and BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Azizi Ansari v. USA, et al
as 20-16926
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, S. LAKE, Warden, UNKNOWN PARTY, named as Chief of BOP Quality Management and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AZIZI ANSARI
Moussaoui v. Scarborough, et al
as 20-1337
Defendant / Appellee:
SCARBOROUGH, Lieutenant, BOP, ADX Agent, SOOKDEO and RICOLCOT
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ZACARIAS MOUSSAOUI
Moussaoui v. Sookdeo
as 20-1350
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ZACARIAS MOUSSAOUI
Defendant / Appellee:
SOOKDEO, Lieutenant, BOP, ADX Agent
Moussaoui v. Ricolcot
as 20-1346
Defendant / Appellee:
RICOLCOT, Captain, BOP, ADX Agent
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ZACARIAS MOUSSAOUI
James Luedtke v. USDC-CAFR
as 20-72621
Not Classified By Court:
DANIEL COGGIN, Counselor at USP Atwater, KATHLEEN S. SAWYER, BOP Director, In re: JAMES LUEDTKE and others
Petitioner:
JAMES LUEDTKE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO
Raymond Aigbekaen v. Donald Trump, et al
as 20-5267
Defendant / Appellee:
William P. Barr, Attorney General, Donald J. Trump, President and Michael Carvajal, BOP Director
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Raymond I. Aigbekaen
William Davis, Jr. v. N. McDowell, et al
as 20-2427
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM S. DAVIS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
C. RIVERS, N. MCDOWELL, J. DORER and others
Jehu Hand v. Steven Merlak, et al
as 20-16410
Petitioner / Appellant:
JEHU HAND
Respondent / Appellee:
STEVEN MERLAK, Warden and HUGH J. HURWITZ, Acting BOP Director
Julianna Lewis v. Richard Ives, et al
as 20-35620
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MARY M. MITCHELL, BOP Regional Director, RICHARD IVES, Warden FCI Sheridan and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JULIANNA MARIE LEWIS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
