Cases 1 - 7 of 7
In re: North Sea Brent Crude O
as 17-2233
Plaintiff:
Michael Sevy, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated,, Gregory H. Smith, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Patricia Benvenuto, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Prime International Trading, Ltd., on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, White Oaks Fund LP, On behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Kevin McDonnell, On behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
BP PLC, Trafigura Beheer B.V., Trafigura AG and others
Defendant:
Royal Dutch Shell Plc, Statoil ASA, John Doe 1 and others
State of California v. Valero Energy Corporation et al
as 3:2017cv03786
Plaintiff:
State of California
Defendant:
Valero Energy Corporation , Valero Energy Partners LP and Plains All American Pipeline, L.P.
Objector:
AOT Energy Americas, LLC and Kinder Morgan, Inc.
Miscellaneou:
BP America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
In re: North Sea Brent Crude Oil Futures Litigation
as 1:2013md02475
Plaintiff:
Prime International Trading, Ltd., Michael Sevy, Gregory Smith and others
Defendant:
BP PLC,, John Doe Nos. 1-50, Royal Dutch Shell plc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
White Oaks Fund LP v. BP PLC et al
as 1:2013cv04553
Plaintiff:
White Oaks Fund LP
Defendant:
BP PLC, Royal Dutch Shell plc, Statoil ASA and others
Cause Of Action: 7 U.S.C. § 25 Fraud - Commodities Leverage Contracts
Sevy v. BP PLC, et al
as 1:2013cv03587
Plaintiff:
Michael Sevy
Defendant:
BP PLC,, Royal Sutch Shell PLC,, Statoil ASA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
City Of Moundridge, Kansas, et al v. Exxon Mobil Corporation, et al
as 09-7153
Plaintiff - Appellant:
City Of Moundridge, KS, City of Winfield, Kansas, City Of Coffeyville, KS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Exxon Mobil Corporation, Royal Dutch/Shell Group, ChevronTexaco Corp. and others
Compliance Marketing, Inc. et al v. Drugtest, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv01241
Plaintiff:
Compliance Marketing, Inc., Compliance Services of East Texas, Connie D. Hagen and others
Defendant:
Drugtest, Inc., Drugtest, Inc., BP America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0014 Clayton Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
