Cases 1 - 10 of 11
WALKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv33281
Plaintiff:
BRANDON WALKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WALKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv24075
Plaintiff:
BRANDON WALKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WALKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv02625
Plaintiff:
BRANDON WALKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WALKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv55993
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN BRANDON WALKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WALKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv56481
Plaintiff:
BRANDON WALKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walker v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2021cv00359
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Anthony Brandon Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
WALKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv50747
Plaintiff:
BRANDON WALKER
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WALKER v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 1:2013cv00146
Plaintiff:
BRANDON WALKER
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, ADAM UNA, GAINESVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WALKER v. GAINESVILLE POLICE DEPT et al
as 1:2013cv00059
Plaintiff:
BRANDON WALKER
Defendant:
GAINESVILLE POLICE DEPT, MIKE SCHENTRUP, ADAM URRA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fowler v. Walker et al
as 1:2011cv03942
Plaintiff:
Jack D. Fowler
Defendant:
Brandon Walker, Thomas Wallace and 12 Jane Does and John Does
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
