Cases 1 - 10 of 123
Andy Muxlow Farms, LLC et al v. Nutrien Ag Solutions, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01015
Plaintiff:
Ty Muxlow, Cal Muxlow and Andy Muxlow Farms, LLC
Defendant:
Bayer Cropscience, LP, Brandt Consolidated, Inc., ORO Agri, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Andy Muxlow Farms, LLC et al v. Nutrien Ag Solutions, Inc. et al
as 1:2024at00673
Defendant:
Bayer Cropscience, LP, Brandt Consolidated, Inc., Nutrien Ag Solutions, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Andy Muxlow Farms, LLC, Cal Muxlow and Ty Muxlow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Vincent Brandt v. Kia America, Inc.
as 8:2024cv01441
Plaintiff:
Vincent Brandt
Defendant:
Kia America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Vincent Brandt v. Kia America, Inc.
as 2:2024cv05415
Plaintiff:
Vincent Brandt
Defendant:
Kia America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Mason Lewis v. City of Manhattan Beach et al
as 2:2024cv03479
Plaintiff:
Mason Lewis
Defendant:
City of Manhattan Beach, Shawn Thompson, Steve Kitsios and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PS) Rogers v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
Kim Edward Rogers
Defendant:
County of Sacramento, City of Sacramento, Jim Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jasper O. Crook v. San Bernardino County Sheriff Department et al
as 5:2023cv02448
Plaintiff:
Jasper O. Crook
Defendant:
San Bernardino County Sheriff Department, Victorville Police Department, Thomas Bechtol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gutierrez v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 3:2023cv02209
Plaintiff:
Emmeline Gutierrez
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Bill Brandt Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brandt v. Concora Credit, Inc.
as 3:2023cv01958
Defendant:
Concora Credit, Inc. and Genesis FS Card Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Megan Brandt
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Brandt v. Capital One, N.A.
as 3:2023cv01939
Plaintiff:
Megan Brandt
Defendant:
Capital One, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
