Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 1 - 10 of 459
ROGERS v. DONATELLI
as 1:2024cv01265
Plaintiff: BRIAN A. ROGERS
Defendant: CHRISTOPHER J. DONATELLI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
EUGENE v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC, We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv03755
Plaintiff: MARK EUGENE
Defendant: NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC,, MR. COOPER, BRIAN GARDNER and others
BATES et al v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2023cv03746
Plaintiff: MITCHELL B BATES, NOEMI P DAGAMI, MITCHELL BRIAN BATES and others
Defendant: ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, MERRICK B. GARLAND, UR M. JADDOU and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03530
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
JAMES MADISON PROJECT et al v. OFFICE OF DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE
as 1:2023cv03457
Plaintiff: JAMES MADISON PROJECT and BRIAN J. KAREM
Defendant: OFFICE OF DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
WALL v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2023cv03342
Plaintiff: JESSE MICHAEL WALL
Defendant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, JUDGE J. ANDERSON, JUDGE WINGO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03319
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
GEBRETSADIKE v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2023cv03198
Plaintiff: AWOKE GEBRETSADIKE
Defendant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, DORY PETERS, KAREEM CAMPBELL and others
MORGAN v. BIDEN
as 1:2023cv03122
Petitioner: DAVID BRIAN MORGAN
Respondent: JOE BIDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
KELLEHER v. REGAN
as 1:2023cv02808
Plaintiff: BRIAN T. KELLEHER
Defendant: MICHAEL REGAN

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?