Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Kaplan v. Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran
as 22-1122
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Chaim Kaplan, individually and as natural guardian of plaintiffs M.K.(1), A.L.K., M.K.(2), C.K. and E.K, Rivka Kaplan, individually and as natural guardian of plaintiffs M.K.(1), A.L.K., M.K.(2), C.K. and E.K, M.K.(1), a minor, by her father and natural guardian, Chaim Kaplan, and by her mother and natural guardian, Rivka Kaplan and others
Defendant:
Bank Saderat Iran, Central Bank Of The Islamic Republic Of Iran, AKA Bank Markazi Jomhouri Islami Iran, Islamic Republic of Iran and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Bank Saderat PLC, Attn: Dr. Hamid Borhani, Managing Director, Bank Saderat 6 Lothbury London EC2R 7HD UK
Kaplan v. Hezbollah
as 20-1053
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Nechama Kumer, Noa Ardstein, Arye Leib Kaplan and others
Defendant:
Democratic People's Republic of Korea, AKA North Korea
Defendant / Appellee:
Hezbollah, AKA Hizbullah, AKA Hizbollah, AKA Hezballah, AKA Hizballah
Kaplan (Reuvane) v. Lebanese Canadian Bank
as 19-3522
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Arkady Graipel, Myra Mandel, Yori Zovrev and others
Defendant:
American Express Bank, Ltd.
Defendant / Appellee:
Lebanese Canadian Bank, SAL
Amicus Curiae:
Professor of Law Janet Cooper Alexander, Professor of Law William D. Araiza, Professor of Law William C. Banks and others
Kaplan et al v. Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran et al
as 1:2019cv03142
Defendant:
Central Bank Of The Islamic Republic Of Iran, Islamic Republic of Iran, Iranian Does 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Maria, M.R., Brian Ardstein and others
Special Master:
Alan Lee Balaran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Kaplan v. Hezbollah
as 1:2019cv03187
Defendant:
Hezbollah, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Hezballah and others
Plaintiff:
Deborah Chana Katzmacher, Danielle Sauter, Rivka Kaplan and others
Special Master:
Alan Lee Balaran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Chaim Kaplan, et al v. Central Bank of Iran, et al
as 16-7142
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Chaim Kaplan, individually and as natural guardian of plaintiffs M.K.(1), A.L.K., M.K.(2), C.K. and E.K, Rivka Kaplan, individually and as natural guardian of plaintiffs M.K.(1), A.L.K., M.K.(2), C.K. and E.K, M.K.(1), a minor, by her father and natural guardian, Chaim Kaplan, and by her mother and natural guardian, Rivka Kaplan and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran, also known as Bank Markazi Jomhouri Islami Iran, Bank Saderat, Iran, Bank Saderat, PLC and others
Special Master - Appellee:
Alan L. Balaran
Chaim Kaplan, et al v. Hezbollah, et al
as 16-7122
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Chaim Kaplan, Rivka Kaplan, Arye Leib Kaplan and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Hezbollah, also known as Hizbullah, also known as Hizbollah, also known as Hezballah, also known as Hizballah and Democratic People's Republic of Korea, also known as North Korea
Special Master - Appellee:
Alan L. Balaran
Kaplan et al v. Al Jazeera
as 1:2010cv05298
Plaintiff:
Chaim Kaplan , Rivka Kaplan , M.K. (1) and others
Defendant:
Al Jazeera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Licci v. American Express Bank Ltd.
as 10-1306
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Yaakov Licci, a minor, by his father and natural guardian Elihav Licci and by his mother and natural guardian Yehudit Licci, et al., Yaakov Licci, a minor, by his father and natural guardian Elihav Licci and by his mother and natural guardian Yehudit Licci, et al., Elihav Licci and others
Defendant - Appellee:
American Express Bank Ltd. and Lebanese Canadian Bank, SAL
KAPLAN et al v. CENTRAL BANK OF THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2010cv00483
Plaintiff:
CHAIM KAPLAN , RIVKA KAPLAN , M.K.(1) and others
Defendant:
CENTRAL BANK OF THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, BANK SADERAT IRAN, BANK SADERAT, PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
