Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Thomas v. Watson et al.
as 1:2024cv00991
Defendant:
Jamal L. Thomas, Ms. D. Watson, St. Brides Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Watson et al
as 1:2024cv00990
Plaintiff:
Jamal L. Thomas
Defendant:
Ms. D. Watson and St. Brides Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garnett v. Johnson et al
as 1:2022cv01058
Plaintiff:
Roderick Murand Garnett
Defendant:
L. Johnson, St. Brides Correctional Center and Ms. D. Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lowe v. Saint Brides Correctional Center et al
as 1:2022cv00171
Plaintiff:
Alvin Lowe
Defendant:
Saint Brides Correctional Center, The Department Of Corrections, Warden Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bazemore v. St. Brides Correctional Center et al
as 3:2021cv00595
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Tyrone Bazemore
Defendant:
St. Brides Correctional Center and Mr. J. Rollins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lowe v. Saint Brides Correctional Center
as 1:2021cv00913
Plaintiff:
Alvin Lowe
Defendant:
Saint Brides Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00640
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry-Lassiter Bey Living Trust v. St. Brides Correctional Center et al
as 2:2020cv00284
Respondent:
R.L. Ward, Amy Floriano, Randall D. Smith and others
Petitioner:
Joshua Perry-Lassiter Bey Living Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Copeland v. Bailey et al
as 1:2018cv01415
Defendant:
Officer M. Bailey and Saint Brides Correctional
Plaintiff:
Dennis Copeland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boone v. St. Brides Correctional Center
as 1:2015cv01608
Petitioner:
Lonnie Lorenzo Boone
Respondent:
St. Brides Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
