Cases 11 - 20 of 34
In re: Donald Robertson Trust
as 19-4012
Petitioner:
DONALD L. ROBERTSON TRUST
Respondent:
DANIEL L. SIMMOND, WEILIN XIE and BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Domai v. Brigham Young University
as 2:2017cv00872
Plaintiff:
Guy M. Domai
Defendant:
Brigham Young University
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
N8 Medical, et al v. Colgate-Palmolive Company
as 17-4049
Plaintiff:
N8 MEDICAL, INC. and N8 MEDICAL, LLC
Plaintiff Intervenor:
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY
Plaintiff Intervenor - Appellant:
N8 PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
COLGATE-PALMOLIVE COMPANY
N8 Medical, et al v. Colgate-Palmolive Company
as 17-4049
Plaintiff:
N8 MEDICAL, INC. and N8 MEDICAL, LLC
Not Yet Classified:
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY
Intervenor Plaintiff:
N8 PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
COLGATE-PALMOLIVE COMPANY
Castellano v. Brigham Young University et al
as 2:2016cv01205
Plaintiff:
Joseph Castellano
Defendant:
Brigham Young University, Scott Elkins and David Tueller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Doe v. Brigham Young University
as 2:2016cv01121
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Brigham Young University
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
Carr v. Brigham Young University et al
as 1:2016cv01732
Plaintiff:
Larry Carr
Defendant:
Brigham Young University, Western Athletic Conference and National Collegiate Athletic Association, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hajicek v. Heperi et al
as 2:2014cv00640
Plaintiff:
Samantha R. Hajicek
Defendant:
Vernon Heperi, Glory Drake, Lacey Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Beus Gilbert PLLC v. Robertson et al
as 2:2014cv00206
Plaintiff:
Beus Gilbert PLLC
Defendant:
Donald Robertson, Brigham Young University, Weilin Xie and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
