Cases 61 - 69 of 69
Alfano et al v. BRP Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv01704
Plaintiff:
Nicole Alfano and Michael Alfano
Defendant:
BRP Inc. and BRP US Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Alfano et al v. BRP Inc. et al
as 2:2008at00845
Plaintiff:
Nicole Alfano and Michael Alfano
Defendant:
BRP Inc. and BRP US Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00330
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Southern Marine Sales, Inc. v. Bombardier Recreational Products, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv00806
Plaintiff:
Southern Marine Sales, Inc.
Defendant:
BRP US Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
BRP US Inc v. Linamar Corporation
as 2:2007cv00764
Plaintiff:
BRP US Inc
Defendant:
Linamar Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Chew et al v. Bombardier Recreational Products, Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv03090
Plaintiff:
Janice Chew and Hull S. Chew
Defendant:
Bombardier Recreational Products, Inc., BRP US Inc., Bombadier Motor Corporation of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Southern Marine Sales, Inc. v. Bombardier Recreational Products, Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv03695
Plaintiff:
Southern Marine Sales, Inc. and Southern Marine Sales, Inc.
Defendant:
BRP US Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
BRP US Inc. v. Louisiana Recreational and Used Motor Vehicle Commission et al
as 3:2007cv00480
Plaintiff:
BRP US Inc.
Defendant:
Louisiana Recreational and Used Motor Vehicle Commission and Southern Marine Sales, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Case name not on file
as 2:2007cv00246
Defendant:
BRP US, Inc. and Michael A. Hansen
Plaintiff:
(Morris) Michael Pitts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
