Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Walsh v. Enge et al
as 3:2015cv01666
Defendant:
Bryant Enge and Mayor Charlie Hales
Plaintiff:
Joseph Walsh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv00750
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 32 U.S.C. § 4300 Uniformed Services Employment & Reemployment Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2013cv00750
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 32 U.S.C. § 4300 Uniformed Services Employment & Reemployment Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00602
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bryant v. Mickelsen et al
as 6:2012cv00178
Plaintiff:
Carleton Douglas Bryant
Defendant:
Troy Mickelsen and City of Albany, Oregon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00844
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Bryant v. Graham et al
as 6:2011cv06038
Plaintiff:
Lon Neil Bryant
Defendant:
Deschutes County and Daniel E. Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Montgomery v. State Agency, Child Family Services Department et al
as 6:2009cv00677
Plaintiff:
Tamesais Montgomery
Defendant:
State Agency, Child Family Services Department, Multnomah County, Susie Biernstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pringle v. Majetich et al
as 6:2008cv06273
Plaintiff:
Eugene Dayton Pringle, Jr
Defendant:
Hank Majetich, Nathan Garibay, Kurpinsky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2008cv06048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
