Cases 21 - 30 of 32
BROWN v. BRYANT
as 3:2011cv03124
Plaintiff:
KENDRA BROWN
Defendant:
LAURA BRYANT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01342
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
IN RE: CAMDEN POLICE CASES
as 1:2011cv01315
Plaintiff:
ALANDA FORREST , JEFFREY HICKS , FRANK SHAW and others
Defendant:
KEVIN PARRY, JASON STETSER, CITY OF CAMDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ALFIERI v. BOROUGH OF SEASIDE HEIGHTS et al
as 3:2011cv00919
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH ALFIERI
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF SEASIDE HEIGHTS , THOMAS BOYD , STEPHEN KORMAN and others
Counter_claimant:
JAMES HANS , BOROUGH OF SEASIDE HEIGHTS , THOMAS BOYD and others
Counter_defendant:
JOSEPH ALFIERI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRYANT v. CITY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2011cv00496
Plaintiff:
DAVID BRYANT
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN, CAMDEN COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MCKNIGHT v. PIERRE BRYANT et al
as 1:2009cv05128
Plaintiff:
LEROY MCKNIGHT
Defendant:
ARLENE PIERRE BRYANT and NAN S. FAMULAR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
THOMPSON v. EVA'S VILLAGE AMD SHELTERING PROGRAM et al
as 2:2009cv01510
Plaintiff:
STEVEN C. THOMPSON
Defendant:
EVA'S VILLAGE AMD SHELTERING PROGRAM, DERRICK WILLIAMS, GREGORY ANDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
YOUNG et al v. SEBRING ASSOCIATESITHE EXCELSIOR II,et al
as 2:2007cv02424
Plaintiff:
BRYANT YOUNG and PAMELA PERKINS
Defendant:
SEBRING ASSOCIATESITHE EXCELSIOR II,et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
