Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Big Oak Farms, Inc. v. US
as 19-1748
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAURA B. MEEK FOR JANET BONDURANT Q-TIP TRUST, SAMMIE L. PONDER, LESLIE FOX FARMS, L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
MARTY HUTCHISON, TERRY HEQUENBOURG, BURKE LAND CO. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
BANES et al v.USA
as 1:2017cv01191
Plaintiff:
BRYANT BANES , NEVA BANES , CARLTON JONES and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
BRYANT v. USA
as 1:2016cv01597
BRYANT v. USA
as 1:2014cv00657
Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
as 14-1335
Amicus Curiae:
CARROLL GANTZ, RALPH D. CLIFFORD, JOSEPH M. BALLAY and others
Defendant / Appellant:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean corporation and SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Plaintiff / Appellee:
APPLE INC., a California Corporation
BRYANT et al v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2012vv00480
Petitioner:
ETHEL J. BRYANT and KYLIE F EASTIN
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
Type:
Other Statutes
BRYANT-TERRELL et al v. USA
as 1:2011cv00332
Plaintiff:
BEVERLY E. BRYANT-TERRELL , LAURA FOREMAN , POLLY LAWRENCE and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
WALDEN et al
as 1:2010cv00495
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY WALDEN, KURT V BRYANT, ALEXANDER WILLIAMS and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
ADAMS et al v. USA
as 1:2010cv00060
Plaintiff:
LISA ADAMS , CHRISTIN ALLAMAN-JONES , GLORIA ALLEN and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Torts - Injury
JONES V MSPB
as 10-3074
Petitioner:
Bryant C. Jones, Bryant C. Jones, Bryant C. Jones and others
Respondent:
Department of Justice, Department of Justice, Department of Justice and others
Merit Systems Protection Board:
, , and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
