Cases 11 - 20 of 232
Bryant v. City of Berea et al.
as 1:2023cv02032
Plaintiff:
James K Bryant and James Bryant
Defendant:
City of Berea, City of Berea Police Department, Daniel J Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02989
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Bryant v. USA
as 3:2023cv00229
Petitioner:
Christopher Lee Bryant
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
J.O.B. et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2023cv00217
Plaintiff:
J.O.B. and Jamus Oran Bryant
Defendant:
United States of America, Frank Kendall III, Capt. Stacy Michelle Angel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bryant v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 2:2023cv02309
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Bryant
Defendant:
C R Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jenkins et al v. Security Transport, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01334
Plaintiff:
Bryant Jenkins and Frank Alcala, Jr.
Defendant:
Security Transport, Inc. and Milos Momcilovic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01323
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities
Bryant v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01227
Plaintiff:
Justin L. Bryant
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bryant v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01046
Plaintiff:
James Bryant
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
