Cases 21 - 30 of 217
Bryant v. NPD Nac et al
as 9:2022cv00143
Plaintiff:
Robert Bryant
Defendant:
NPD Nac, Nacogdoches County Jail and Nacogdoches Courthouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Watts v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv02776
Petitioner:
Bryant Christopher Watts
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watts v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2022cv00108
Petitioner:
Bryant Christopher Watts
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Flowers v. Young et al
as 4:2022cv00424
Plaintiff:
Colby Bryant Flowers
Defendant:
Gary Yang, The Paris News and Gary Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. City of San Antonio et al
as 5:2022cv00413
Plaintiff:
Kerwin Bryant
Defendant:
City of San Antonio, Det. #2230 FNU Seaton, #2101 R. Valadez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flowers v. Sixth District Court of Lamar County
as 4:2022cv00311
Plaintiff:
Colby Bryant Flowers
Defendant:
Sixth District Court of Lamar County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. Pedro et al
as 6:2022cv00137
Plaintiff:
Jerome Bryant
Defendant:
Officer Olayinka M Pedro, Sgt William C Rogers, Sgt Christopher J Helmig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Back v. Arnold et al
as 6:2022cv00360
Plaintiff:
Robert Back
Defendant:
FNU Arnold, Sgt. FNU Spier, Sgt. FNU Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v Smith, et al
as 6:2022cv00103
Plaintiff:
Justin Keith Bryant
Defendant:
Sheriff Larry Smith and Paul Banner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rolle v. Prince et al
as 4:2022cv00615
Plaintiff:
Thomas Henry Rolle, II
Defendant:
J Prince, Ed Gonzales, Kim Ogg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
