Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Bryant v. Virginia Employment Commission
as 3:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Alicia Bryant and Alicia Renee Bryant
Defendant:
Virginia Employment Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BRYANT v. Mutual Of Omaha Insurance Company
as 1:2023cv00414
Plaintiff:
JOHN BRYANT
Defendant:
Mutual Of Omaha Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Bryant v. Mutual Of Omaha Insurance Company
as 1:2022cv01397
Plaintiff:
John Bryant
Defendant:
Mutual Of Omaha Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Bryant v. Spinnaker Resorts, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
John Bryant
Defendant:
Spinnaker Resorts, Inc., King's Creek Plantation, L.L.C. and King's Creek Resorts, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice Of Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00298
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Bryant v. Mutual Of Omaha Insurance Company
as 2:2021cv00674
Plaintiff:
John Bryant
Defendant:
Mutual Of Omaha Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Commonwealth of Virginia v. Skyline Metrics, LLC et al
as 7:2019cv00463
Defendant:
Skyline Metrics, LLC, Bryant Cass and Adventis, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00851
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Dickson v. Sugg et al
as 4:2015cv00050
Plaintiff:
John M. Dickson, Jr.
Defendant:
Judge Bryant L. Sugg, Former Judge Mr. Howard Vincent Conway, Jr, Commonwealth's Attorney Mr. Thomas C. Daniel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
