Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Cox et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2023cv02724
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Alan Cox, Henrietta Dallas, Bryon Holland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Biggs v. Fitness International et al
as 1:2022cv00928
Plaintiff:
Bryon Biggs
Defendant:
Fitness International and ESPORTA Fitness
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clay v. Carter et al
as 1:2021cv00782
Plaintiff:
Dino Victor Clay
Defendant:
Kevin M. Carter, Christopher Brechtel, Ayoka Tucker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Biggs v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv00553
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Bryon Biggs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Salama v. Pesantez et al
as 1:2019cv04003
Defendant:
Cuenca Coronel Trucking Inc. and Bryon Pesantez
Plaintiff:
Wael Salama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Wirth et al v. Wheatfield, Town of et al
as 1:2018cv01486
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Mascardo (obo J.M., M.M.), David Berent, Carl Krolczyk (obo N.F.) and others
Defendant:
Wheatfield, Town of, Crown Beverage Packaging, LLC, Occidental Chemical Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kistner v. The City of Buffalo et al
as 1:2018cv00402
Plaintiff:
James C. Kistner
Defendant:
The City of Buffalo, Bryon Lockwood, Daniel Derenda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pallo v. Berryhill
as 1:2017cv06080
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Bryon Pallo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Drennan v. Eckert
as 1:2017cv00949
Petitioner:
Bryon Drennan, Sr.
Respondent:
S. Eckert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Borders El Bey v. Doe #31 et al
as 6:2017cv06565
Plaintiff:
Michael Borders El Bey
Defendant:
John Doe #31, John Doe #32, Marianne Yaru and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
