Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Plumhoff v. Central Mortgage Company et al
as 1:2017cv00556
Plaintiff:
Michael Plumhoff
Defendant:
Central Mortgage Company, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, Steven Plaisance and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
WALKER et al v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00350
Plaintiff:
JOVAN WALKER and DAVID WALKER
Defendant:
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC, WELLS FARGO BANK, NA, CITIBANK, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
felder et al v. Buonassissi, Henning & Lash, PC et al
as 8:2013cv01741
Plaintiff:
harold e. felder and cherry a. felder
Defendant:
Buonassissi, Henning & Lash, PC, joseph buonassissi, II, richard henning, jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Louis Deabreu v. Novastar Home Mortgage, Inc
as 13-1316
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUIS PIERRE DEABREU and RENEE LAVINIA DEABREU
Defendant - Appellee:
NOVASTAR HOME MORTGAGE, INCORPORATED, MICHIGAN FIDELITY ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, d/b/a Franklin Mortgage Funding, WELLS FARGO BANK, d/b/a America's Servicing Company and others
Shirley v. Buonassissi Henning & Lash, PC et al
as 8:2011cv00304
Defendant:
Buonassissi Henning & Lash, PC , U.S. Bank National Association and America Service Center
Plaintiff:
Marcia Shirley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
Buonassissi et al v. Yacko et al
as 8:2010cv01272
Plaintiff:
Joseph V. Buonassissi, II , Richard E. Henning , Richard A. Lash and others
Defendant:
Ishmael D. Camp and Antonia S. Camp
Counter_claimant:
Ishmael D. Camp
Counter_defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association and Buonassissi, Henning & Lash, PC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Agbaje v. Access National Settlement Services, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv03025
Plaintiff:
Taiwo Agbaje
Defendant:
Access National Settlement Services, LLC, Michelle Bonds, Smartertitle. Com and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
