Cases 41 - 50 of 168
Ramirez v. Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2016cv00626
Plaintiff:
Jesse Ramirez
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Burrell v. Martin et al
as 3:2016cv00187
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Lanard Burrell
Defendant:
E. Martin, United States Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Harris v. State of Mississippi et al
as 4:2016cv00006
Plaintiff:
Detrick Dewayne Harris
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Christopher Epps, E. L. Sparkman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. United States of America et al
as 3:2015cv00908
Plaintiff:
Nathan Jenkins
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, FCI Yazoo City Medium Security Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ingram v. United States of America et al
as 3:2015cv00842
Plaintiff:
Cory Ingram
Defendant:
United States of America, Bureau of Prisons and Anthony Chambers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bassil v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2015cv00640
Plaintiff:
James L. Bassil
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, S. Fisher, Yazoo Prison Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Okpala v. Vasquez et al
as 5:2015cv00040
Plaintiff:
Okey Garry Okpala
Defendant:
FNU Vasquez, FNU Lacy, FNU Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randle v. Samuels et al
as 3:2014cv01001
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Randle
Defendant:
Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Eric Holder and United States Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Martinez v. United States of America et al
as 3:2014cv00810
Plaintiff:
Thomas Martinez
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
